Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Table of Contents

...

  1. Not ready for development backlog is taken into work

  2. Poor requirements provisioning process 

  3. Uncontrolled scope volatility

  4. Too many stakeholders on business side

Expand
titleOther
  • Issues with backlog refinement process, i.e. it's inefficient or absent at all 

  • JIRA tooling issues or human mistakes (tapping on A/C field without intention)

  • Details or tech notes are added after a story is marked as "ready for development"

  • Too actively involved and interested PO has direct access to requirements, and can edit "ready for development" user story 

  • Not robust or totally absent requirements management process 

...

Info

Calculation notes

  • If an item is changed several times in different iterations it will be counted as a changed item for each iteration.

  • Sub-items are not included in the calculation because they usually do not represent delivery value at a business level. 

  • If an item was returned to ready for development status several times, only the changes that were made after the last ready for development status assignment will be reflected on the metric.

Data source

Data for the metric can be collected from a task tracking system (Jira, TFS, Rally, etc.).

...